When playing an RPG, the mechanics are how you interact with the world your character exists in. The mechanics are what determine whether a blow lands or misses, whether a character can lift a particular burden or not, whether a spell is successfully cast, and whether someone is robust enough to overcome a deadly poison.
With that said, just because the mechanics allow you to do something, that doesn't mean that you should do that thing. And players and Game Masters need to learn to have these conversations respectfully so that everyone can enjoy the game, and set their expectations accordingly.
![]() |
| Just because the manual says you can, please don't. |
As always, don't forget to sign up for my weekly newsletter to
get all my updates right in your inbox. Also, if you've got a bit of
spare cash that you'd like to use to help keep the wheels turning,
consider becoming a Patreon patron! Also, be sure you're following all of my followables, check out my LinkTree.
Lastly, for hundreds of extra articles on gaming, weird history, and for more free fiction, check out my Vocal archive, too!
What If We Removed The Naval Blockade?
An example of what I'm talking about comes from book 1 of the Pathfinder adventure path Hell's Rebels, Hell's Bright Shadow (and there's a Pathfinder 2E conversion for this adventure path, for those who are interested). For those who haven't played it, the adventure begins as a fascist tyrant takes control of the city of Kintargo, and the city is cut off from trade via a naval blockade. The purpose of the blockade is to make it clear that there are a limited amount of resources in the city, and that players will not be able to simply travel somewhere else in order to acquire more limited resources. While it exists, mechanically, the purpose it serves is to turn the city into a pressure cooker.
You aren't supposed to try to remove the blockade. Even if you are technically capable of doing so.
When I played this adventure path, my vigilante and his sorcerous sidekick figured out that we could destroy this blockade with relative ease at early levels (it was after level 2, but before level 7, my memory is vague). The vigilante had acquired an adamantine gauntlet, and with his focus on delivering punch-based attacks, that gauntlet had proven the bane of locked doors, jawbones, and a building or two in the city. We sat down, and did the math. Using magic to allow the vigilante to breathe underwater, and a pair of swim fins for movement, he could easily scuttle the warships without the crews being able to do much in the way of retaliation before the ship sank. The sailors were prepared to fight the city, or other ships, not to go beneath the waves.
![]() |
| Not even bell diving marines! |
However, when we came to our Game Master with this information, we did so asking, "If we did this, would it work?" Both in the sense that we wanted to know if our math and rule interpretations were correct, and if there was something we didn't know about that might come to bite us. Paraphrased, the answer we received was, "Yes, you could do this, but please don't, I'm not set up for that."
And upon receiving that answer the two of us nodded, fist-bumped, and then went back to the plot we'd actually been hip deep in, regarding fighting back against the city's new "mayor" and his crack down on freedom and expression.
Capabilities, Actions, And The Arms Race
I've talked about this before on this blog, but when players and Game Masters are adversarial, the use of mechanics can become and arms race. Players are trying to find the super special combination of abilities and resources that will allow them to destroy the Game Master's plot entirely, while the Game Master focuses less on creating a world or telling a story and attempting to control, punish, or counter what the players are doing.
And I can tell you from experience, this is a bad dynamic to put in place. Firstly, because it divides the game into winners and losers (something you should try to avoid in most RPGs), and because the Game Master always has more than the players do. They have access to every monster, every spell, every magic item and conditions... but "defeating" the players isn't the goal of the game.
Take the above example, and consider what would have happened if there had been an adversarial approach. The Game Master could have installed secret panels underneath the ships, blocking attempts to scuttle them by putting in hidden adamantine armor. They could have put shock troops on the vessels, ready to be deployed at a moment's notice to deal with the vigilante's plan. Or they could have upped the ante, let us scuttle the blockade, and then sent in a far more aggressive force that would have complicated everything else from that point forward, giving us more enemies, more resistance, and so on.
But it was just easier, and more expedient, to have a simple conversation where it was made clear those ships don't have stats in the book, and they exist as a plot device to facilitate the current challenge. While our numbers were correct, bringing in such an outside event would lead to ripples they didn't want to deal with. And we, as players, respected that.
And this is the kind of conversation you should be able to have between GMs and players. Whether it's players going too far afield in a direction that will make FAR more work for the GM than they signed up for, a player misunderstanding how a mechanic works and being corrected by a GM, or even a GM asking a player to please limit their use of particular abilities or resources that are becoming a problem, it's important to be able to talk things out collaboratively.
Generally speaking, acknowledge that all of you are there to make a better story, and to have fun doing it. In this case, consider the players as actors, and the Game Master as the director... you're all allowed your own visions, and you should be working together so that the final product best suits what all of you want.
You all have the same goal... or, at least, you should. And cooperation always leads to a better result than instigating a mathematical arms race over whose methods will be victorious.
Like, Follow, and Stay in Touch!
That's all for this week's Crunch post! To stay on top of all my content and releases, make sure you subscribe to my newsletter at the bottom of the page!
Again, for more of my work, check out my Vocal archive, and stop by the Azukail Games YouTube channel, or the dark sci fi channel I contribute stories to, The A.L.I.C.E. Files! Or if you'd prefer to read some of my books, like my sword and sorcery novel Crier's Knife or my latest short story collection The Rejects, then head over to My Amazon Author Page!
To stay on top of all my latest releases, follow me on Blue Sky, Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, and now Pinterest as well! To support my work, consider Buying Me a Ko-Fi, or heading to The Literary Mercenary's Patreon page to become a regular, monthly patron. That one helps ensure you get more Improved Initiative, and it means you'll get my regular, monthly giveaways as a bonus!















